
Rumors about Google's forthcoming tablet are increasing, which astounds me -- as they portray this as something 
new. Hey, Google already formally stated it would produce an Android tablet. The rumormongers have got the reasons 
wrong, too. Google isn't gunning for Apple but Amazon.
The retail giant is by far the biggest competitive threat standing  before Android today. Amazon has customized Android, released its own  hardware, ditched Google's browser for its own Silk, established a  viable app store alternative to Google Play and created a curated user  experience that rivals Apple's. In just one quarter, Amazon's Kindle  Fire jumped ahead of all other Android tablets, putting it second to iPad. Every Kindle Fire sold is one more brick in the wall blocking the success of the broader Android ecosystem. 
I strongly disagree with CNET's Roger Cheng, who asserts:  "The worst thing Google could do to its budding Android tablet business  is get into it". A branded tablet is the best thing Google can do now  for Android tablets.
Kindle Fire burns Android
Amazon announced $199 Kindle Fire in late September 2011 and started selling the media tablet in early November.  According to IDC, the retailer shipped 4.7 million Kindle Fires during  Q4, jumping to second place market share during the launch quarter.  Amazon pushed Samsung down to third place. The Android tablet makers had  16.8 percent and 5.8 percent share, respectively, with Samsung growing  from 5.5 percent in third quarter. 
Something else: Kindle Fire is largely responsible for Android market  share gains -- to 44.6 percent during fourth quarter, up from 32.3  percent three months earlier. During Q4 the two leading tablet operating  systems were iOS and Amazon's Android, with combined share of 71.5  percent. Let me restate that: 
Not Android, but Amazon Android.
Google's tablet has got to get past Kindle Fire before ever touching  iPad, which had 54.7 percent market share during fourth quarter,  according to IDC. 
Amazon's $199 is focus of Google tablet rumors, for good reason. Our polls show that most people don't want to spend more. But there is much more to Kindle Fire's success than price. There are other compelling $199 tablets, such as Lenovo's Ideapad A1, that trail far behind. Price is just table stakes. iPad competitors need more than lower-cost tablets to win.
Fractured Android
What Amazon does right, like Apple, that Google must do: Sell a lifestyle.  Amazon prioritizes features and pricing that matter for living one  digital lifestyle around its cloud-connected services, rather than  offering the latest, hardware and software. Like Apple, Amazon offers a  stack of content and services. Kindle Fire isn't about techie features  but a digital lifestyle around Amazon products and services.
Unlike other Android tablet manufacturers, Amazon takes complete  control over the entire stack. Kindle Fire features an Amazon-customized  version of Android 2.x, its own Android app store, music and movie  stores, ebook store, web browser and customized media consumption  software and services. Sony is closest, followed by Samsung, among  Android tablet manufacturers.
Amazon is creating a curated experience that matches Apple's and, in  some respects, exceeds it. Consumers can buy Kindle books for Fire, but  read them on their iPhone, Android handset or other device. Amazon  allows movies and music on Kindle Fire or other devices. From Apple it's  just devices supporting iTunes Store. People buying into the Amazon  lifestyle get Kindle Fire plus something else. That's an added benefit  not available from Apple or other Android tablet vendors -- okay, Sony  is closest.
Amazon's continued success is good for driving up Android shipments  against iPad, but it's bad broadly. Kindle Fire benefits Amazon and its  customers willing to buy into the curated experience but at the expense  of the larger Android ecosystem.
Amazon's objectives are contrary to Google's. For example, if I type  the web address to Google's Android Market into the Silk browser on my  wife's Kindle Fire, Amazon's Android app store opens instead. On other  Android tablets, Google Play is default but there is option to sideload  from other stores, like Amazon's.
Android already is fragmented. Kindle Fire, Amazon Android, the  retailer's app store and curated services stand to fracture the platform  and wrestle control from Google. CEO Larry Page, Android leader Andy  Rubin and other Google execs aren't dummies. They can see exactly what's  happening.
Google Play to Win
Google will bring a large arsenal to bear on Amazon:
1. The Google brand, which like Apple's and Amazon's is well-known and highly regarded. Branding and perception are 
everything in business.
2. Price, assuming Google goes for $199, as rumored. It's what I'd do.
3. Ice Cream Sandwich. Why wouldn't Google offer its  newest Android version and in process finally jumpstart adoption.  Google's partners are dragging their asses getting their devices to  Android 4.0. As of April 2, ICS accounted for just 2.9 percent of 
all Android devices, which means cell phones, too.
4. Curated digital lifestyle apps. The Android  ecosystem should prepare for the coming Google Android stack to rival  Amazon's and to compete with other partners. About a month ago, the  search and information giant renamed Android Market Google Play and last week prominently placed a link on the dark bar across services pages like Gmail and Plus. 
The name change emphasizes Google over Android as dominant brand and  foreshadows the curated approach to come. Like Amazon and Apple, Google  offers ebooks, movies and music at its store. Then there is the broader  digital lifestyle supported by services like search and maps. 
5. Integration. Google is in process of  cross-integrating all its products and services, many of which are  tightly tied to Android and most prominently and deeply in Ice Cream  Sandwich. Already, Google integration pays off big on smartphones.  According to comScore's "2012 Mobile Future in Focus" report:
Google-owned apps led across both iPhones and Android  devices in terms of total unique active users. For iPhone users, YouTube  ranked as the top app by unique visitors, followed by Google Maps,  Facebook, Yahoo! Weather and Pandora Radio. Analysis of the Android  market found that Google Search led as the top app, followed by Gmail,  Google Maps, Facebook and Google News & Weather.
What Google needs now is a successful tablet running ICS.
6. Reference Design. In January 2010, Google  unveiled the Nexus One smartphone, which it sold direct to customers.  Many bloggers and journalists wrongly wrote that Google charted new  retail waters by selling direct, missing the point: Google wasn't going  into retail sales but establishing a reference design for manufacturers  and developers. From that perspective, Google executed brilliantly with  N1 and continued with December release of the Samsung-made Nexus S and  the Galaxy Nexus a year later.
A Google tablet as reference design is more important now than when I called for it in January 2011.  Because of Amazon Android. Google can rally developers to a pure  Android tablet running the newest OS version, while leading way for  hardware partners to follow. 
If Google fails, there will be two Androids competing against iOS tablets. What's that saying about a house divided? 
Photo Credit: Joe Wilcox
betanews.com